链接到两个第三方共享库时,c ++程序崩溃

 有些浮夸 发布于 2022-12-31 13:15

我有两个用于linux平台的外包共享库(没有源代码,没有文档).当它们单独链接到程序时(g ++ xx.cpp lib1.so或g ++ xx.cpp lib2.so),这些库工作正常.

但是,当任何c ++程序同时链接到这两个共享库时,程序不可避免地会因"双重释放"错误而崩溃(g ++ xx.cpp lib1.so lib2.so).

即使c ++程序是一个空的 hello world程序并且与这些库无关,它仍然会崩溃.

#include 
using namespace std;
int main(){
     cout<<"haha, I crash again. Catch me if you can"<

Makefile文件:

g++ helloword.cpp lib1.so lib2.so

我得到一些线索,这些lib1.so lib2.so库可能共享一些常见的全局变量,并且它们会两次销毁一些变量.我尝试过gdb和valgrind,但是无法从backtrace中提取有用的信息.

有什么方法可以隔离这两个共享库并使它们以沙箱方式工作?

EDITED(添加核心转储和gdb回溯):

我只是将前面提到的玩具空helloword程序与两个库(平台:带有gcc4.8.2的centos 7.0 64bits)联系起来:

g++ helloworld.cpp  lib1.so lib2.so -o check

Valgrind的:

==29953== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
==29953==    at 0x4C29991: operator delete(void*) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==29953==    by 0x613E589: __cxa_finalize (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==    by 0x549B725: ??? (in /home/fanbin/InventoryManagment/lib1.so)
==29953==    by 0x5551720: ??? (in /home/fanbin/InventoryManagment/lib1.so)
==29953==    by 0x613E218: __run_exit_handlers (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==    by 0x613E264: exit (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==    by 0x6126AFB: (below main) (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==  Address 0x6afb780 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 624 free'd
==29953==    at 0x4C29991: operator delete(void*) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==29953==    by 0x613E589: __cxa_finalize (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==    by 0x4F07AC5: ??? (in /home/fanbin/InventoryManagment/lib2.so)
==29953==    by 0x5039900: ??? (in /home/fanbin/InventoryManagment/lib2.so)
==29953==    by 0x613E218: __run_exit_handlers (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==    by 0x613E264: exit (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==29953==    by 0x6126AFB: (below main) (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)

gdb回溯消息:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff677d989 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007ffff677f098 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x00007ffff67be197 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3  0x00007ffff67c556d in _int_free () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4  0x00007ffff7414aa2 in __tcf_0 () from ./lib1.so
#5  0x00007ffff678158a in __cxa_finalize () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#6  0x00007ffff739f726 in __do_global_dtors_aux () from ./lib1.so
#7  0x0000000000600dc8 in __init_array_start ()
#8  0x00007fffffffe2c0 in ?? ()
#9  0x00007ffff7455721 in _fini () from ./lib1.so
#10 0x00007fffffffe2c0 in ?? ()
#11 0x00007ffff7debb98 in _dl_fini () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

更新

感谢@RaduChivu的帮助,我发现了一个非常类似的场景: 当程序退出时__tcf_0处的分段错误,看起来确实两个库之间存在全局变量冲突.考虑到我没有这两个外部共享库的源文件,除了使用两个单独的进程外,还有其他方法可以解决这个冲突吗?

撰写答案
今天,你开发时遇到什么问题呢?
立即提问
热门标签
PHP1.CN | 中国最专业的PHP中文社区 | PNG素材下载 | DevBox开发工具箱 | json解析格式化 |PHP资讯 | PHP教程 | 数据库技术 | 服务器技术 | 前端开发技术 | PHP框架 | 开发工具 | 在线工具
Copyright © 1998 - 2020 PHP1.CN. All Rights Reserved 京公网安备 11010802041100号 | 京ICP备19059560号-4 | PHP1.CN 第一PHP社区 版权所有