dbms_lock.relase无法释放自定义的锁？

最近开发人员说使用dbms_lock.allocate_unique自定义的锁在使用dbms_lock.relase无法释放，下面来个演示的例子来看看到底怎么一回

最近开发人员说使用dbms_lock.allocate_unique自定义的锁在使用dbms_lock.relase无法释放，下面来个演示的例子来看看到底怎么一回事？

1、演示锁不能释放的情形

--演示环境
goex_admin@GOBO1> select * from v$version where rownum<2;

BANNER
----------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production

--调用包lock_demo来分配一个锁，关于lock_demo包的代码见文章尾部
goex_admin@GOBO1> DECLARE
2 s VARCHAR2 (200);
3 BEGIN
4 lock_demo.request_lock (6, s);
5 DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (s);
6 END;
7 /
10737420671073742067151 ----->得到lock handle
0

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

--在session 2查看用户自定义锁
goex_admin@GOBO1> @query_defined_lock

NAME PROGRAM SPID OSUSER SID PID TERMINAL STATUS LOCKID EXPIRATION
-------------- ------------------------ -------- -------- ---- ------- ---------- -------- ---------- -----------------
control_lock sqlplus@SZDB (TNS V1-V3) 30841 robin 1049 14567 pts/0 INACTIVE 1073742067 20130420 18:00:00

--在session 2尝试释放在session分配的锁，直接调用包DBMS_LOCK
goex_admin@GOBO1> DECLARE
2 RetVal NUMBER;
3 LOCKHANDLE VARCHAR2(32767);
4
5 BEGIN
6 LOCKHANDLE := '10737420671073742067151';
7
8 RetVal := SYS.DBMS_LOCK.RELEASE ( LOCKHANDLE );
9
10 DBMS_OUTPUT.Put_Line('RetVal = ' || TO_CHAR(RetVal));
11
12 DBMS_OUTPUT.Put_Line('');
13
14 COMMIT;
15 END;
16 /
RetVal = 4 ----->此处获得了为4的返回码即Do not own lock specified by id or lockhandle

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

--在原来的session 1释放锁，，直接调用包DBMS_LOCK，此时锁被成功释放
goex_admin@GOBO1> DECLARE
2 RetVal NUMBER;
3 LOCKHANDLE VARCHAR2(32767);
4
5 BEGIN
6 LOCKHANDLE := '10737420671073742067151';
7
8 RetVal := SYS.DBMS_LOCK.RELEASE ( LOCKHANDLE );
9
10 DBMS_OUTPUT.Put_Line('RetVal = ' || TO_CHAR(RetVal));
11
12 DBMS_OUTPUT.Put_Line('');
13
14 COMMIT;
15 END;
16 /
RetVal = 0 --------> The lock was released successful.

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

--在session 2查询不到之前分配的锁
goex_admin@GOBO1> @query_defined_lock

no rows selected

2、自定义锁阻塞的情形

--首先分配一个锁
--注意下面的SQL提示符之前的SID代表不同的session，如1073@GOBO1>，即表示session ID 为1073。以下类同。
1073@GOBO1> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
1073@GOBO1> DECLARE
2 s VARCHAR2 (200);
3 BEGIN
4 lock_demo.request_lock (6, s);
5 DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (s);
6 END;
7 /
10737420671073742067151
0

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

--在第二个session 1032中尝试请求锁并插入数据
1032@GOBO1> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
1032@GOBO1> DECLARE
2 s VARCHAR2 (200);
3 BEGIN
4 lock_demo.request_lock (DBMS_LOCK.ss_mode, s);
5
6 DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (s);
7
8 INSERT INTO lock_test (action, when)
9 VALUES ('started', SYSTIMESTAMP);
10
11 DBMS_LOCK.sleep (5);
12
13 INSERT INTO lock_test (action, when)
14 VALUES ('ended', SYSTIMESTAMP);
15
16 COMMIT;
17 END;
18 /
>>10737420671073742067151 --->本行的符号“>>”是有SecureCRT在空闲每300s自动生成的字符
0 --->也就是session 被阻塞

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

--在第三个session 1033中尝试请求锁并插入数据
1033@GOBO1> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
1033@GOBO1> DECLARE
2 s VARCHAR2 (200);
3 BEGIN
4 lock_demo.request_lock (DBMS_LOCK.ss_mode, s);
5
6 DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (s);
7
8 INSERT INTO lock_test (action, when)
9 VALUES ('started', SYSTIMESTAMP);
10
11 DBMS_LOCK.sleep (5);
12
13 INSERT INTO lock_test (action, when)
14 VALUES ('ended', SYSTIMESTAMP);
15
16 COMMIT;
17 END;
18 /
>>10737420671073742067151 --->本行的符号说明同session 1032
0

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

--在另外一个session观察被阻塞的情形
--下面的查询在session 1073的锁未释放前执行，可以看到1073的Exclusive锁阻塞了1032与1033的Row Share
1037@GOBO1> @waiting_sess_by_lock